Bollywood of India: Geopolitical Texts of Belonging and Difference and Narratives of Mistrust and Suspicion

Authors

  • Iqbal Shailo Dr. Iqbal Shailo is a researcher, policy analyst and social media strategist based in Ottawa, Canada.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2016.138

Keywords:

Bollywood Movies, the Other, Identity, Partition, Belonging, Difference, Mistrust

Abstract

A number of Bollywood films create meaning and geopolitical narratives through dialogue, raw images, settings, costumes and historical contexts. This study examines three contemporary Indian films —Earth (Deepa Mehta, 1998), Lagaan (Ashutosh Gowariker, 2001) and Sarfarosh (John Matthew Matthan, 1999) — that explore sub-continental history with a particular focus on insecurity, mistrust and suspicion.  It discusses how socio-cultural and regional differences are (re)produced and how geopolitical meanings of ‘we’ and ‘they’ are narrated and constructed through Bollywood. These films construct an image of identity, belonging and difference, emphasizing that Hindus and Muslims are Indians however some legacies and suffering brought on during the partition of British India are still alive in memories when discrimination and exclusion are practiced in their ancestral homelands.

Author Biography

Iqbal Shailo, Dr. Iqbal Shailo is a researcher, policy analyst and social media strategist based in Ottawa, Canada.

 [Iqbal Shailo received a Ph.D. in Critical Geopolitics (Political Geography) and an MA in Public Policy and Public Administration from Carleton University, Ottawa and Concordia University, Montreal respectively. He also obtained a Post-Graduate Diploma in Journalism from Concordia University and earned his second MA in English Literature. His research interests are broadly in transnational security, popular cinema, new social media, regional integration, radicalization, countering violent extremism, grassroots empowerment and public policy development.

He was engaged with teaching at Carleton University, Ottawa for a couple of years. He has practical experience working with national and international NGOs addressing issues relating to the disadvantaged societies in North America and countries of the South Asian region. He has presented papers at various academic and policy forums and has numerous publications to his credit.]

 

References

REFERENCES:

Athique, Adrian. 2011. “Diasporic Audiences and Non-Resident Media: The Case of Indian Films,” Participations (Journal of Audience and Reception Studies), Vol. 8(2), pp. 1-23.

Basu, Anustup.2010. Bollywood in the Age of New Media, Edinburgh University Press.

Bhabha, Homi.1994. The Location of Culture, Routledge.

Chadha, Kalyani and Kavoori, Anandam P. 2008. “Exoticized, Marginalized, Demonized: The Muslim “Other” in Indian Cinema,” Global Bollywood, pp. 131-145.

Chakraborty, Chandrima.2004. “Bollywood motifs: Cricket fiction and fictional cricket,” International Journal of the History of Sport, Vol. 21 (3/4), pp. 549-572.

Das, A.1999. “Kargil or not, Sarfarosh stands alone: Amir Khan,” Express Newsline, May 31, pp. 4.

Desai, Jigna and Dudrah, Rajinder.2008. “The essential Bollywood,” In Rajinder Dudrah and Jinga Desai (eds.) The Bollywood Reader, Open University Press.

Fazila-Yacoobali, Vazira.2002. “Yeh mulk hamara ghar: the ‘national order of things’ and Muslim identity in John Mathew Mattan’s Sarfarosh,” Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 11(2), pp. 183–198.

Film4.com. “50 Films To See Before You Die,” http://www.film4.com/special-features/top-lists/top-50-films-to-see-before-you-die, [Accessed on 15th of August, 2015].

Ganti, Tejaswini.2004. Bollywood. A Guidebook to Popular Hindi Cinema, London, Routledge.

Gregory, Derek.2004. The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq, Blackwell, Malden, MA.

Gulzar, Nihalani Govind and Chatterji, Saibal.2003. Encyclopedia of Hindi Cinema, Encyclopedia Britannica (India) Pvt. Ltd., pp. 136–137.

Kazmi, F.1994. “Muslim Socials and Female Protagonist: Seeing a dominant Discourse at Work,” In Z. Hazan (ed.) Forging Identities, Gender, Communities and the State, New Delhi, Kali for Women, pp. 226-43.

Khilnani, S.1997. The Idea of India, London, Penguin Books.

Lichtner, Giacomo and Bandyopadhya, Sekhar. 2008. “Indian Cinema and the Presentist Use of History,” Asian Survey, Vol. 48(3), pp. 431-452.

Pauwels, Heidi. 2007. Indian Literature and Popular Cinema: recasting classics, Routledge.

The Hindustan Times (New Delhi).1999. “Sarfarosh is tax free”, 6 June, pp. 1.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-11

How to Cite

Shailo, I. (2016). Bollywood of India: Geopolitical Texts of Belonging and Difference and Narratives of Mistrust and Suspicion. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 5(2), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2016.138

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016): Spring 2016

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.