Bollywood of India: Geopolitical Texts of Belonging and Difference and Narratives of Mistrust and Suspicion

Iqbal Shailo

Abstract


A number of Bollywood films create meaning and geopolitical narratives through dialogue, raw images, settings, costumes and historical contexts. This study examines three contemporary Indian films —Earth (Deepa Mehta, 1998), Lagaan (Ashutosh Gowariker, 2001) and Sarfarosh (John Matthew Matthan, 1999) that explore sub-continental history with a particular focus on insecurity, mistrust and suspicion.  It discusses how socio-cultural and regional differences are (re)produced and how geopolitical meanings of ‘we’ and ‘they’ are narrated and constructed through Bollywood. These films construct an image of identity, belonging and difference, emphasizing that Hindus and Muslims are Indians however some legacies and suffering brought on during the partition of British India are still alive in memories when discrimination and exclusion are practiced in their ancestral homelands.


Keywords


Bollywood Movies, the Other, Identity, Partition, Belonging, Difference, Mistrust

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES:

Athique, Adrian. 2011. “Diasporic Audiences and Non-Resident Media: The Case of Indian Films,” Participations (Journal of Audience and Reception Studies), Vol. 8(2), pp. 1-23.

Basu, Anustup.2010. Bollywood in the Age of New Media, Edinburgh University Press.

Bhabha, Homi.1994. The Location of Culture, Routledge.

Chadha, Kalyani and Kavoori, Anandam P. 2008. “Exoticized, Marginalized, Demonized: The Muslim “Other” in Indian Cinema,” Global Bollywood, pp. 131-145.

Chakraborty, Chandrima.2004. “Bollywood motifs: Cricket fiction and fictional cricket,” International Journal of the History of Sport, Vol. 21 (3/4), pp. 549-572.

Das, A.1999. “Kargil or not, Sarfarosh stands alone: Amir Khan,” Express Newsline, May 31, pp. 4.

Desai, Jigna and Dudrah, Rajinder.2008. “The essential Bollywood,” In Rajinder Dudrah and Jinga Desai (eds.) The Bollywood Reader, Open University Press.

Fazila-Yacoobali, Vazira.2002. “Yeh mulk hamara ghar: the ‘national order of things’ and Muslim identity in John Mathew Mattan’s Sarfarosh,” Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 11(2), pp. 183–198.

Film4.com. “50 Films To See Before You Die,” http://www.film4.com/special-features/top-lists/top-50-films-to-see-before-you-die, [Accessed on 15th of August, 2015].

Ganti, Tejaswini.2004. Bollywood. A Guidebook to Popular Hindi Cinema, London, Routledge.

Gregory, Derek.2004. The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq, Blackwell, Malden, MA.

Gulzar, Nihalani Govind and Chatterji, Saibal.2003. Encyclopedia of Hindi Cinema, Encyclopedia Britannica (India) Pvt. Ltd., pp. 136–137.

Kazmi, F.1994. “Muslim Socials and Female Protagonist: Seeing a dominant Discourse at Work,” In Z. Hazan (ed.) Forging Identities, Gender, Communities and the State, New Delhi, Kali for Women, pp. 226-43.

Khilnani, S.1997. The Idea of India, London, Penguin Books.

Lichtner, Giacomo and Bandyopadhya, Sekhar. 2008. “Indian Cinema and the Presentist Use of History,” Asian Survey, Vol. 48(3), pp. 431-452.

Pauwels, Heidi. 2007. Indian Literature and Popular Cinema: recasting classics, Routledge.

The Hindustan Times (New Delhi).1999. “Sarfarosh is tax free”, 6 June, pp. 1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2016.138

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Iqbal Shailo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 New articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

 

This journal is published by the University Library System, University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.

 

ISSN 2159-2411 (print) 2158-8724 (online)