(Class)ifying the Queer in India: Reading the Intersection of Class with Sexuality in the Bengali Film Arekti Premer Golpo (2010)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.897Keywords:
Arekti Premer Golpo (2010), Bengali cinema, queer representation, class and sexuality, bhadralok, Rituparno Ghosh, neoliberalismAbstract
This article examines how class structures queer visibility in Kaushik Ganguly's Arekti Premer Golpo (2010). Building on scholarship that has already identified the film's classed contrast between the urban filmmaker Abhiroop and the materially precarious former female impersonator Chapal Bhaduri, it places that inequality within a longer history of bhadralok representation in Bengali cinema. Through close textual analysis, the article considers space, English-language cultural capital, consumer culture, documentary authorship, and hierarchies of masculinity and effeminacy. It argues that queer visibility is unevenly distributed: Abhiroop's mobility, education, and control of the documentary apparatus provide representational authority that remains less available to Chapal. The film's parallel temporal structure therefore reveals how class, caste-coded respectability, gender expression, and sexuality intersect, shifting the analytical question from who becomes visible to who controls the conditions of visibility.
References
Ahmad, A. (2008). In theory: Classes, nations, literatures. Verso.
Altman, D. (1996). On global queering. Australian Humanities Review, 2. https://australianhumanitiesreview.org/1996/07/01/on-global-queering/
Bakshi, K. (2014). Ārekti premer gôlpo: The yesteryear female impersonator, the post-liberalization transvestite and a “queer” stereotype. In S. Singh (Ed.), Gay subcultures and literatures: The Indian projections (pp. 112–126). Indian Institute of Advanced Studies.
Bakshi, K., & Sen, P. (2016). A room of hir own: The queer aesthetics of Rituparno Ghosh. In S. Datta, K. Bakshi, & R. K. Dasgupta (Eds.), Rituparno Ghosh: Cinema, gender and art (pp. 204–223). Routledge.
Banerjee, S. (2023). Modernities and the popular melodrama: The Suchitra-Uttam Yug in Bengali cinema. Orient BlackSwan.
Banerjee, S. M. (2006). Child, mother and servant: Motherhood and domestic ideology in colonial Bengal. In A. A. Powell & S. L. Hurley (Eds.), Rhetoric and Reality: Gender and the Colonial Experience in South Asia (pp. 16–49). Oxford University Press.
Bhowmik, S. (1981). Sattar dashaker bangla chobi. In A. Acharya (Ed.), Sattar dashak (pp. 28–43). Anushtup Publication.
Biswas, M. (2002). Historical realism: Modes of modernity in Indian cinema 1940–60. [Doctoral dissertation, Monash University]. https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/thesis/Historical_realism_modes_of_modernity_in_Indian_cinema_1940-60/5440915?file=16692476.
Biswas, M. (2006). Apu and after: Re-visiting Ray’s cinema. Seagull Books.
Biswas, M. (2011). Neo-bhadralok darpan. In M. Biswas (Ed.), Baromas (pp. 255–260). Ajkal Samity.
Biswas, S., Dasgupta, R. K., & Mahn, C. (2023). Queer politics in times of new authoritarianisms. South Asian Popular Culture, 21(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2023.2232181
Blashill, A. J., & Powlishta, K. K. (2009). The impact of sexual orientation and gender role on evaluations of men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014583
Blashill, A. J., & Powlishta, K. K. (2012). Effects of gender-related domain violations and sexual orientation on perceptions of male and female targets: An analogue study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1293-1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9971-1
Champlin, S., & Li, M. (2020). Communicating support in pride collection advertising: The impact of gender expression and contribution amount. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(3), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2020.1750017
Chatterjee, P. (1990). The political culture of Calcutta. In S. Chaudhari (Ed.), Calcutta: The living city, Vol. II: The present and future (pp. 27–33). Oxford University Press.
Chatterjee, S. (2021). The ‘Good Indian Queer Woman’ and the family: Politics of normativity and travails of (queer) representation. South Asian Popular Culture, 19(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2021.1940549
Chatterjee, S. (2022). Caste, desire, and Dalit queer resistance in “Geeli Puchhi.” Women’s Studies, 51(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2021.2007924
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039?origin=JSTOR-pdf
Cronin, R. (1975). The government of Eastern Bengal and Assam and 'class rule' in Eastern Bengal. In J. R. McLane (Ed.), Bengal in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (pp. 92–120). Michigan State University Press.
Dasgupta, R. K. (2016). Digital queer spaces: Interrogating identity, belonging and nationalism in contemporary India. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arts London]. https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/8960/1/Dasgupta%2C%20Rohit%20-%20PhD.pdf
Dasgupta, R. K., & Bakshi, K. (2018). Opening closets and dividing audiences: Rituparno Ghosh, the queer star of Bengali cinema. South Asian Popular Culture, 16(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2018.1455877
Dasgupta, R. K., Datta, S., & Bakshi, K. (2016). The world of Rituparno Ghosh: An introduction. In S. Datta, K. Bakshi, & R. K. Dasgupta (Eds.), Rituparno Ghosh: Cinema, gender and art (pp. 1–26). Routledge.
De, B. (1993). Introduction: ‘A mirror cracked from side to side’—colonialism, class, caste, and communalism. In S. Das & S. Bandopadhyay (Eds.), Caste and Communal Politics in South Asia (pp. 1–28). K. P. Bagchi & Co.
Dey, S. (2015). Just like a film star!: being Rituparno Ghosh. South Asian History and Culture, 6(2), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2014.999434
Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R. Castronovo, & D. D. Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics (pp. 175–194). Duke University Press.
Duggan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Beacon Press.
Dutta, A. (2015). Beyond the binary: (Trans)gender narratives and class distinction in Rituparno Ghosh’s later films. South Asian History and Culture, 6(2), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2014.999438
Ferguson, R. (2004). Aberrations in Black: Toward a queer of color critique. University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: Volume I: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1978)
Ganguly, K. (Director). (2010). Arekti Premer Golpo [Just Another Love Story] [Film]. Tapan Biswas.
Ghosh, A. (2002). Revisiting the 'Bengal Renaissance': Literary Bengali and low-life print in colonial Calcutta. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(42), 4329-4338. https://doi.org/10.2307/4412747
Ghosh, P. (2004). Where have all the 'bhadraloks' gone? Economic and Political Weekly, 39(3), 247-251. https://www.epw.in/journal/2004/03/perspectives/where-have-all-bhadraloks-gone.html
Glick, P., Gangl, C., Gibb, S., Klumpner, S., & Weinberg, E. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: More negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 57(1–2), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9195-3
Gooptu, S. (2003). The glory that was: An exploration of the iconicity of New Theatres. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 23(1–2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201X-23-1-2-286
Gooptu, S. (2010). Bengali cinema: An other nation. Routledge.
Gooptu, S. (2013). ‘Bengali’ cinema: Its making and unmaking. In K. M. Gokulsing, & W. Dissanayake (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Indian cinemas (pp. 37–50). Routledge.
Gopinath, G. (2005). Impossible desires: Queer diasporas and South Asian public cultures. Duke University Press.
Gupta, A. (2005). Englishpur ki kothi: Class dynamics in the queer movement in India. In A. Narrain, & G. Bhan (Eds.), Because I have a voice: Queer politics in India (pp. 136–157). Yoda Press.
Hunt, C. J., Fasoli, F., Carnaghi, A., & Cadinu, M. (2016). Masculine self-presentation and distancing from femininity in gay men: An experimental examination of the role of masculinity threat. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(1), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039545.
Kapur, R. (2010). De-radicalising the rights claims of sexual subalterns through ‘tolerance’. In R. Leckey, & K. Brooks (Eds.), Queer theory: Law, culture, empire, (pp. 37–52). Routledge.
Khubchandani, K. (2019). Caste, queerness, migration and the erotics of activism. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal. https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.7173.
Kumar, P. (2022). Sexuality, abjection, and queer existence in contemporary India. Routledge.
Majumdar, N. (2009). Wanted cultured ladies only! Female stardom and cinema in India, 1930s-1950s. University of Illinois Press.
Mandal, S. (2002). Rituparno Ghosh: The women’s director of Bangla cinema. In J. Jain, & S. Rai (Eds.), Films and feminism: Essays in Indian cinema (pp. 17–38). Rawat Publications.
Mandal, S., & Mondal, K. (Eds.). (2023). Rituparno Ghosh: On/and film. Hawakal Publishers.
Menon, N. (2009). Sexuality, caste, governmentality: Contests over ‘gender’ in India. Feminist Review, 91(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.46
Mukherjee, M. (2017). Rethinking popular cinema in Bengal (1930s-1950s): of literariness, comic mode, mythological and other avatars. South Asian History and Culture, 8(2), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2017.1304088
Mukherjee, M., & Bakshi, K. (2017). A brief introduction to popular cinema in Bengal: Genre, stardom, public cultures. South Asian History and Culture, 8(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2017.1304082
Nag, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2021). Tollygunge to Tollywood: The Bengali film industry reimagined. Orient BlackSwan.
Pahwa, K. (2010, March 16). ‘Arekti Premer Golpo’ movie review: Watch out for Rituparno Ghosh, the actor. TopNews. https://topnews.in/arekti-premer-golpo-movie-review-watch-out-rituparno-ghosh-actor-2300880
Rao, R. (2020). Out of time: The queer politics of postcoloniality. Oxford University Press.
Reddy, G. (2005). With respect to sex: Negotiating hijra identity in South India. University of Chicago Press.
Ross, O. (2014). Communal tensions: Homosexuality in Raj Rao’s The Boyfriend. Rupkatha Journal, 6(1), 108–119. https://rupkatha.com/raj-raos-the-boyfriend/.
Roy, S. (2022). Changing the subject: Feminist and queer politics in neoliberal India. Duke University Press.
Salvati, M., Ioverno, S., Giacomantonio, M., & Baiocco, R. (2016). Attitude toward gay men in an Italian sample: Masculinity and sexual orientation make a difference. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: A Journal of the NSRC, 13(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0218-0
Sarkar, B. (2010). Mourning the nation: Indian cinema in the wake of Partition. Orient BlackSwan.
Sarkar, T. (2001). Hindu wife, Hindu nation. Hurst.
Sircar, O., & Jain, D. (2012). New intimacies/old desires: Law, culture, and queer politics in neoliberal times. Jindal Global Law Review, 4(1), 1–16. https://researchgate.net/publication/343267882_New_Intimacies_Old_Desires_Law_Culture_and_Queer_Politics_in_Neoliberal_Times
Tellis, A. (2012). Disrupting the dinner table: Rethinking the ‘queer moment’ in India. Jindal Global Law Review, 4(1), 142–156. https://completejusticepodcast.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/Ashley+Tellis+-+Disrupting+the+Dinner+Table+-+Re-thinking+the+Queer+Movement+in+Contemporary+India.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sourav Saha, Shyamkiran Kaur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
This journal is published by 
