Disability, Agency, and Adaptation: Comparing Forrest Gump (1994) and Laal Singh Chaddha (2022)

Authors

  • Hasan Yüksel Cankiri Karatekin University School of Economics and Administrative Sciences Department of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations CANKIRI/TURKEY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.771

Keywords:

Disability representation, Forrest Gump, Laal Singh Chaddha, film adaptation, comparative film analysis, ableism, cinematic form, Hollywood and Hindi cinema, disability studies, Bollywood

Abstract

This article compares representations of disability, agency, and social participation in Robert Zemeckis's Forrest Gump (1994) and Advait Chandan's Laal Singh Chaddha (2022). Rather than treating achievement as evidence that disability has disappeared, it examines how these related films negotiate disabling barriers, family support, education, movement, military service, work, and intimacy. A comparative qualitative reading of narrative, dialogue, performance, framing, editing, and sound identifies six recurring areas of representation. Because Laal Singh Chaddha adapts Forrest Gump, the study distinguishes inherited plot structures from transformations arising through changed historical settings, character relationships, and audiovisual choices. Both films challenge certain expectations about disabled protagonists by granting their central characters narrative authority and varied social roles. At the same time, their exceptional-success plots risk suggesting that recognition must be earned through unusual accomplishments. The comparison contributes to disability and film studies by showing how adapted popular narratives can affirm agency while retaining unresolved tensions between inclusion, individual resilience, and structural inequality.

Author Biography

Hasan Yüksel, Cankiri Karatekin University School of Economics and Administrative Sciences Department of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations CANKIRI/TURKEY

BA: Karadeniz Technical Uni. Western Languages and Literature, English Language and Literature (2009)

MA: Süleyman Demirel Uni. Turkey; Labor Economics and Industrial Relations (2011)

PhD: Süleyman Demirel Uni. Turkey; Labor Economics and Industrial Relations (2014)

References

Botha, S., & Harvey, C. (2024). Disabling discourses: Contemporary cinematic representations of acquired physical disability. Disability & Society, 39(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2060801

Boyd, N. (2016). The warped mirror: The reflection of the ableist stare in David Lynch’s The Elephant Man. Disability & Society, 31(10), 1321–1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1257421

Chandan, A. (Director). (2022). Laal Singh Chaddha [Film]. Aamir Khan Productions; Viacom18 Studios.

Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. University of California Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. Columbia University Press.

Ghai, A. (2015). Rethinking disability in India. Routledge.

Hutcheon, L., & O’Flynn, S. (2013). A theory of adaptation (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Lawson, A., & Beckett, A. E. (2021). The social and human rights models of disability: Towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(2), 348–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533

Longmore, P. K. (2003). Why I burned my book and other essays on disability. Temple University Press.

Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2001). Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11523

Norden, M. F. (1994). The cinema of isolation: A history of physical disability in the movies. Rutgers University Press.

Paftalı, E., Tunç-Paftalı, A., & Yıldız, G. (2025). “I hope I don’t die before my child”: The representation of autism in Turkish films. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 13(1), 288–310. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2025.690

Safran, S. P. (1998). Disability portrayal in film: Reflecting the past, directing the future. Exceptional Children, 64(2), 227–238.

Stemler, S. E. (2015). Content analysis. In R. A. Scott & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–14). Wiley.

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf

Whittington-Walsh, F. (2002). From freaks to savants: Disability and hegemony from The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939) to Sling Blade (1997). Disability & Society, 17(6), 695–707.

Zemeckis, R. (Director). (1994). Forrest Gump [Film]. Paramount Pictures.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

How to Cite

Yüksel, H. (2026). Disability, Agency, and Adaptation: Comparing Forrest Gump (1994) and Laal Singh Chaddha (2022). CINEJ Cinema Journal, 14(2), 609–633. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.771

Issue

Section

Articles