Dementia, Cognitive Narratology, and Unreliable Narration in Florian Zeller’s The Father
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2025.751Keywords:
dementia, cognitive narratology, unreliable narrator, point of view, film structureAbstract
Florian Zeller’s The Father is a film about dementia as a narrative disorder. The film tells a fragmented story through the eyes of Anthony, who is living with late-onset dementia. In it, the spectator is asked to witness Anthony’s encounters with his environment, which always result in a cognitive blankness—a lack of recognition that is the symptom of his condition. The film both represents and enacts this blankness by asking the spectator to witness and misunderstand a series of scenes strung together by nothing more than that lack of recognition. The Father thus constitutes not only a narrative of dementia but also a narrative about narrative—about its grammars, processes, and agents; about the questions of narratability and cognition attendant to any act of storytelling, and about how the answers to those questions might change when they are posed in the cinematic.
References
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
Barthes, R. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237–272.
Behuniak, S. M. (2010). The living dead? The construction of people with Alzheimer’s disease as zombies. Ageing & Society, 31(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000693
Booth, W. C. (1983). The rhetoric of fiction. University of Chicago Press.
Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. Methuen.
Bordwell, D. (1989). Making meaning: Inference and rhetoric in the interpretation of cinema. Harvard University Press.
Bordwell, D. (1996). Convention, construction, and cinematic vision. In D. Bordwell & N. Carroll (Eds.), Post-theory: Reconstructing film studies (pp. 87–107). University of Wisconsin Press.
Branigan, E. (1992). Narrative comprehension and film. Routledge.
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
Cohen, L. (2016). Introduction. In A. Leibing & L. Cohen (Eds.), Thinking about dementia: Culture, loss, and the anthropology of senility (pp. 1–19). Rutgers University Press.
Eder, J., Jannidis, F., & Schneider, R. (2011). Characters in fictional worlds: An introduction. In J. Eder et al. (Eds.), Characters in fictional worlds: Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 3–66). De Gruyter.
Fludernik, M. (1996). Towards a “natural” narratology. Routledge.
Herman, D. (2009). Cognitive narratology. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), Handbook of narratology (pp. 47–64). De Gruyter.
Hastie, A. (2007). Cupboards of curiosity: Women, recollection, and film history. Duke University Press.
Ingarden, R. (1973). The cognition of the literary work of art. Northwestern University Press.
Iser, W. (2000). The range of interpretation. Columbia University Press.
Jahn, M. (1997). Windows of focalization: Deconstructing and reconstructing a narratological concept. Style, 30, 241–267. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45063726
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an aesthetic of reception. University of Minnesota Press.
Kenan, S. R. (2002). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Open University Press.
Krüger-Fürhoff, I. M., et al. (2022). The politics of dementia: Forgetting and remembering the violent past in literature, film and graphic narratives. De Gruyter.
Lanser, S. S. (1982). The narrative act: Point of view in prose fiction. Princeton University Press.
Liveley, G. (2019). Narratology. Oxford University Press.
McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413475622
Nell, V. (1988). The psychology of reading for pleasure: Needs and gratifications. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(1), 6–50.
Nünning, V. (Ed.). (2015). Reconceptualising fictional (un)reliability and (un)trustworthiness from a multidisciplinary perspective: Categories, typology and functions. In Unreliable narration and trustworthiness: Intermedial and interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 59–83). De Gruyter.
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Sontag, S. (1978). Illness as metaphor. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sternberg, M. (1978). Expositional modes and temporal ordering in fiction. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tompkins, J. P. (Ed.). (1980). Reader-response criticism. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Zeller, F. (Director). (2020). The Father [Film]. Sony Pictures Entertainment.
Zeller, F., & Hampton, C. (2020). The Father: Final script.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Slavica Srbinovska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
