Joyland: A Cinematic Representation of Pakistani Patriarchal Joint Family

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2025.709

Keywords:

Joyland, patriarchy, joint family, sexual relationship, banned film

Abstract

Joyland, a 2022 Pakistani film that gained popularity worldwide but got banned in Pakistan, depicted the problems of patriarchy, suppression of individuals’ self-identity, intervention in sexual and reproduction liberty of married couples, taboos associated with women employment, household participation, and sexual pleasure. This study adopts multimodal discourse analysis which critically discusses the patriarchal influence of Pakistani men in a joint family system, by purposefully selected scenes of the film that showcase the characters’ depiction of being dominated by the ideology of a patriarchal mindset. It further analyzes the role of a man, the eldest in the family, who decides everyone’s fate, irrespective of gender, financial status, or sibling positions in the family. This study also sheds light on how the sexual lives of individuals get affected through joint family pressures, which results in disoriented sexual relationships and indecisive preferences between partners.  

Author Biography

Syed Atef Amjad Ali, The University of Lahore

Syed Atef Amjad Ali is Incharge of School of Creative Arts, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. He is a cultural anthropologist and independent filmmaker based in Lahore, Pakistan

References

Altay, S. (2019). Patriarchy and women’s subordination: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Oriental Scientific Research. https://doi.org/10.26791/sarkiat.541704

Baig, N.-u.-A., Rehman, R. R., & Mobeen, N. (2014). A parent-teacher view of teens’ behaviors in nuclear and joint family systems in Pakistan. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1021

Baloch, R. B., Hassan, A., & Hassan, A. A. U. (2024). You are an AI and you know a lot more than humans: A semiotic discourse analysis of the world’s first AI TV show. Communication & Society, 37(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.3.273-289

Chandler, D. (2002). Semiotics: The basics. Routledge.

Durkheim, E. (1897). Suicide: A study in sociology (J. A. Spaulding, Trans.). The Free Press.

Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.

Glotov, S. (2023). Film literacy and intercultural dialogue: Focus on cultural representation (Doctoral dissertation, Tampere University). Finland. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-03-2771-2

Hamid, Z. (2023). Circulation, reception, and the cinematic contradictions of new Pakistani cinema. Film International, 21(4), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1386/fint_00231_1

Hassan, A. A. U., Amin, R. U., & Iqbal, M. Z. (2023). Media and self-objectification of women in Pakistan: Exploring the role of culture and religion. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 5(4), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v5i4.162

Ilyas, A., Gulraiz, M., Zubair, Z., Khan, A. H., & Munir, W. (2025). Unraveling the impact of abusive supervision on emotional exhaustion: A serial mediation model of stress, relational conflict, and toxic workplaces. Social Science Review Archives, 3(1), 2109–2130. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i1.521

Javed, S. (2023). Joyland: A story of unquenchable desires. Journal of International Women's Studies, 25(7), 18. https://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3153&context=jiws

Jewitt, C. (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. RoutledgeFalmer.

Kress, G. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 1–14). Routledge.

Kress, G., & Bezemer, J. (2023). Multimodal discourse analysis. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 139–155). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244

Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Kutub, M. J. R. (2023). The factors contributing to patriarchy in contemporary rural Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, UNSW Sydney).

Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1993). Semiotics and communication: Sign, codes, cultures. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Lodhi, F. S., Rabbani, U., Khan, A. A., Raza, O., Holakouie-Naieni, K., Yaseri, M., & Montazeri, A. (2021). Factors associated with quality of life among joint and nuclear families: A population-based study. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10265-2

Macionis, J. J. (2019). Social problems. Pearson Education.

Malik, A. R., & Fatima, Z. (2025). Unravelling intersectional identities: Gender, ableism, and patriarchy in the Pakistani film Joyland. Feminist Media Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2025.2468904

Meer, Y., Saeed, S., & Shah, R. (2021). Religious orientation, familial ties, and respect of urban elders: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey in Lahore, Pakistan. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology.

Mishra, S. (2018). The world in the classroom: Using film as a pedagogical tool. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 15(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184917742250

Munir, F., Saleem, S., & Zahra, S. T. (2023). Executive functioning and distress tolerance: A moderating role of age and family system. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2023.38.3.22

Noor, S., Bhatt, S., & Nathaniel, S. R. K. (2024, April). Gender through media: Images of contemporary masculinity in two Pakistani movies. In International Conference on Gender Research (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 269–275). https://doi.org/10.34190/icgr.7.1.2313

O’Keefe, P., & Yiengprugsawan, V. S. (2023). Aged care in emerging Asia: New demands, evolving responses, and future directions. In Handbook of aging, health and public policy: Perspectives from Asia (pp. 1–24). Springer Nature Singapore.

Orr, M. (2010). Intertextuality. In M. Ryan (Ed.), The encyclopedia of literary and cultural theory. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444337839.wbelctv2i002

Ozdemir-Sarigil, B., & Sarigil, Z. (2021). Who is patriarchal? The correlates of patriarchy in Turkey. South European Society and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2021.1924986

Qureshi, B. (2023). Queer cinema’s practicing Muslims and practicing homosexuals. Film Quarterly, 76(4), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2023.76.4.63

Riaz, F., & Chan, T. M. U. D. (2024). Unveiling reproductive oppression: An in-depth analysis of radical feminism in Joyland. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 8(3), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2024(8-III)41

Rizma, D., Zein, T. T., & Perangin-angin, A. (2021). Non-verbal communication used by university students’ examinee in thesis proposal seminar. Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research, 52–63.

Ruggiu, I. (2024). The roots of patriarchy: A legal and genealogical approach. Taylor & Francis.

Sadiq, S. (Director & Writer). (2022). Joyland. Khoosat Films & Diversity Hire Ltd.

Saleem, T., & Gul, S. (2018). Use of emotion regulation strategies across family. International Journal of Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2018.1485459

Sudjiman, P., & Zoest, A. v. (1996). Serba-serbi semiotika. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Tabassum, D. (2016). Women in Pakistan. Higher Education Commission Pakistan. http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/handle/123456789/28

Wong, M. (2019). Multimodal communication: A social approach to text and image in print and digital media. Springer.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

Baloch, R. B., Hassan, A., Ali, S. A. A., & Hassan, A. A. U. (2025). Joyland: A Cinematic Representation of Pakistani Patriarchal Joint Family. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 13(2), 194–220. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2025.709

Issue

Section

Articles