Double-Edged Sword: Unearthing Toxicity in Bollywood’s Empowered Female Characters

Piyush Kumar; Milan Chauhan; Ajeet Singh

doi:10.5195/cinej.2026.701

Double-Edged Sword: Unearthing Toxicity in Bollywood’s Empowered Female Characters

Authors

Piyush Kumar https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2005-5029
Milan Chauhan Indian Institute of Technology, (BHU), Varanasi https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1736-7401
Ajeet Singh https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0385-851X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.701

Keywords:

Bollywood, empowerment, double-edged sword, hypermasculinity, toxic traits

Abstract

The representation of women in contemporary Bollywood films has offered valuable insights into the discourse surrounding the feminine sphere. Within the patriarchal framework, critiques of femininity have emerged, advocating for positive depictions of ‘strong females.’ This study delves into movies featuring empowered female characters, mainly focusing on the analysis of Khiladiyon ka Khiladi (1996), Fukrey (2013), Gulaab Gang (2014), and Begum Jaan (2017). Notably, this paper introduces the idea of toxic femininity in Bollywood cinema, contending that female characters exhibit similar ‘toxic’ features. This notion challenges the discourse critiquing hypermasculine traits and machismo, often addressed by feminist scholars, filmmakers, and female protagonists. The investigation centers on understanding the visual encoding of glorified masculine characteristics evident in onscreen female characters. Additionally, the study explores how body language and choice of profession serve as sites for 'performed' protest by female characters. While such protests are generally viewed and applauded by both genders, the paper posits an alternative viewpoint, suggesting that they are a double-edged sword, undermining positive communication between the sexes.

References

Alonzo, D., & Vasquez, G. (2009). Hypermasculinity, intimate partner violence, sexual aggression, social support, and child maltreatment risk in urban, heterosexual fathers taking parenting classes. Child Welfare, 88(4), 135–55. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45400432.

Althusser, L. (2006). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, 9(1), 86–98.

Anujan, D., Schaefer, D.J., & Karan, K. (2012). The changing face of Indian women in the era of global Bollywood. In D. Schaefer & K. Karan (Eds.), Bollywood and Globalization (pp. 110–126). London: Routledge.

Bordo, S. (2018). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. In W. E. Cain, L. A. Finke, J. McGowan, Sharpley-Whiting, & J. J Williams (Eds.) The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism (3rd ed., pp. 2095–2111). WW Norton.

Chatterjee, S. (2016). ‘English Vinglish’ and Bollywood: What is ‘new’about the ‘new woman’? Gender, Place & Culture, 23(8), 1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2015.1136816

Chauhan, M. (2025). Echoes of liminality: Hidden transcripts and subtle resistance in Bhojpuri-speaking women’s Kajari folksongs. Ethnography, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381251346318

Datta, S. (2000). Globalisation and representations of women in Indian cinema. Social Scientist, 28(3/4), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/3518191.

Ferguson, M. (2019). ‘I Retract That Bit…’: Hypermasculinity and violence in martin McDonagh’s films. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory, 30(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2019.1561127

Hussain, S. & Hussein, N. (2019). The (Im)Possibility of decolonising gender in South Asia: A reading of Bollywood’s ‘New Women.’ Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 4(4–5), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2019.1666660

Irigaray, L. (1993). An ethics of sexual difference. New York: Cornell University Press.

Irshad, S. (2023). Hegemonic femininity: Negotiating the stereotypes of gender in the Indian movies Fire (1996) and Shakuntala Devi (2020). Media Watch, 15(3), 345–366.https://doi.org/10.1177/09760911231180343

Jensen, R. (2017). The end of patriarchy: Radical feminism for men. North Geelong: Spinifex Press.

Jensen, R. (2019, December 2). Masculinity: Toxic, healthy, or human. The Good Men Project. https://goodmenproject.com/ethics-values/masculinity-toxic-healthy-or-human-mkdn/

Jha, S. (2022). Unbecoming Men: The masculinity crisis of the Bollywood hero. Third Text, 36(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2022.2057679

Johnson, E. (1962). Organized crime: Challenge to the American legal system. Part I: Organized crime: The nature of its threat, the reasons for its survival. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 53(4), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.2307/1140572.

Kaur, S, & Sharma, V. (2016). Weepies going dirty and machos doing masti: Unveiling the female chauvinist pigs in Indian cinema. Media Watch 7(3), 370–380.

Kavka, M. (2002). The gothic on screen. In J. Hogle (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction(pp. 209–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521791243

Lippmann, M., Lawlor, N., & Leistner, C. (2023). Learning on OnlyFans: User perspectives on knowledge and skills acquired on the platform. Sex Cult, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi:10.1007/s12119-022-10060-0

Litam, S., Speciale, M., & Balkin, R. (2022). Sexual attitudes and characteristics of OnlyFans Users. Archives of sexual behavior, 51(6), 3093–3103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02329-0

Litosseliti, L. (2014). Gender and language theory and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

Mondal, S. (2014). Whiteness, miscegenation, and anti-colonial rebellion in Rudyard Kipling’s ‘The Man who would be King.’ Victorian Literature and Culture 42(4), 733–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24577478

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18, https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6.

Gil, C. N., Ramaiah, M., Mantsios, A., Barrington, C., & Kerrigan, D. (2021). Best Practices and Challenges to Sex Worker Community Empowerment and Mobilisation Strategies to Promote Health and Human Rights. In C. N. Gil, M. Ramaiah, A. Mantsios, C. Barrington, D. Kerrigan (Eds.) Sex Work, Health, and Human Rights: Global Inequities, Challenges, and Opportunities for Action, (pp. 189–206). Springer International Publishing. https://doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64171-9_11

Thakur, N. (2023). How Bollywood is turning indian women into toxic feminists?. Filmed on December 13, 2023, in India, 00:05:22. https://youtu.be/C_9Q1ocl_O4?si=2qVOzaeLuCyY5Rkq

Pardiwalla, F. (2024, March 8). “From Gangubai Kathiawadi to Stree, female-led Bollywood movies that broke the box office.” Filmfare.com. https://www.filmfare.com/news/bollywood/from-gangubai-kathiawadi-to-stree-female-led-bollywood-movies-that-broke-the-box-office-57288.html

Paunksnis, R. C., & Paunksnis, Š. (2020). Masculine anxiety and ‘New Indian Woman’ in the films of Anurag Kashyap. South Asian Popular Culture, 18(2), 149–62. https://doi:10.1080/14746689.2020.1773656

Prasad, M. M. (2009). Fan Bhakti and Subaltern sovereignty: Enthusiasm as a political factor. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(29), 68–76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40279290.

Sharma, S. (2018). Transnational publics, nationalist ideology and the ‘woman question’ in Hindi cinema: The Film Queen (2014). South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 41(1), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2017.1357094

Sheridan, A. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Pantheon.

Sonkar, P., & Srivastava, M. (2023). Unveiling the silver screen: Exploring the impact of movies on criminal cases from a social learning perspective. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(5), 1–6.

Srsic, A., Dubas-Jakóbczyk, A., & Kocot E. (2021). The economic consequences of decriminalizing sex work in Washington, DC—A conceptual model. Societies, 11(3), 108–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030112

Viswamohan, A. I., & Chaudhuri, S. B. (2020). Bollywood’s angromance: Toxic masculinity and male angst in Tere Naam and Kabir Singh. Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture, 5(2), 146–170.

Wolf, C. (1986). Legitimation of oppression: Response and reflexivity. Symbolic Interaction, 9(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1986.9.2.217

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

Kumar, P., Chauhan, M., & Singh, A. (2026). Double-Edged Sword: Unearthing Toxicity in Bollywood’s Empowered Female Characters. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 14(1), 68–100. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.701

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Spring

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
4. the Work has not previously been published;
5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.