The Symbolic Significance of Deer in Ildiko Enyedi’s On Body and Soul

Sanjay Surin

doi:10.5195/cinej.2026.698

The Symbolic Significance of Deer in Ildiko Enyedi’s On Body and Soul

Authors

Sanjay Surin Symbiosis Centre for Media and Communication, Pune https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9519-2348

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.698

Keywords:

On Body and Soul, deer symbolism, human-nature relationship, anthropomorphism, environmental aesthetics

Abstract

This paper examines the symbolic significance of deer in Ildiko Enyedi’s 2017 film On Body and Soul. Through a close analysis of the film’s visual and narrative elements, the paper explores how the deer imagery serves as a powerful metaphor for the characters’ emotional journeys and the duality inherent in the human condition. The paper also reflects on the broader implications of animal symbolism in the film, considering the complexities of anthropomorphism and the potential risks of reinforcing reductive human-nature dichotomies. The findings suggest that while the film’s use of deer symbolism effectively conveys the emotional and psychological dimensions of human experience, a more nuanced approach that acknowledges the complexities of the human-nature relationship could lead to a richer and more thought-provoking engagement with these themes.

References

Achin, I. A., & Bianus, A. B. (2022). Symbolism analysis using semiotic approach in Malaysian animated film. Jurnal Gendang Alam (GA), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.51200/ga.v12i2.4191

Blythe, J. (2023). Reductive representationalism and the determination of phenomenal properties. Erkenntnis, 90(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00686-3

Brookes, C. E. (1991). Jung’s concept of individuation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 19(2), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.1.1991.19.2.307

Close, G. S. (2020). Screening slaughter: The repressed politics and troubled aesthetics of Gabriel Serra Argüello’s La Parka (2013). Humanimalia, 12(1), 51–94. https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9424

Cudworth, E. (2015). Killing animals: Sociology, species relations and institutionalized violence. The Sociological Review, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.12222

D, Maori. (2022). Deer spirit animal: Symbolism and meaning. Fauna. https://fauna-protect.com/en-in/blogs/spirit-animals/spirit-animal-deer?srsltid=AfmBOorMmL1q-wC8lxOGktLKZlWlNOVf3DZqxbgNHt6b8fTqeGJsEocR

Djavadova, A. (2024). Duality of nature in the works of Dostoevsky F.M. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10669209Enyedi, I. (Director). (2017). On Body and Soul. Inforg-M&M Film Kft., Hungarian National Film Fund.

Florea, C., & David, D. (2014). Symbol-emblem, symbol-code and mythical connotations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5160–5163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1092

Grant, C. (2019) Beast fables: a videographic study of cinematic deer and transhuman children. The Cine Files 14, Retrieved October 2, 2024, from https://www.thecine-files.com/cgrant/

Grasso, C., Lenzi, C., Speiran, S., & Pirrone, F. (2020). Anthropomorphized nonhuman animals in mass media and their influence on human attitudes toward wildlife. Society and Animals, 31(2), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-bja10021

Green, R. S., & Mun, C. (2019). Representing Buddhism through mise-en-scène, diegesis, and mimesis: Kim Ki-duk’s ‘Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring’. International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture, 29(1), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.16893/ijbtc.2019.06.29.1.177

Hila, J. (2022). In the spirit of his time. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 15(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1163/19409060-bja10020

Jack, A. I., Dawson, A. J., & Norr, M. E. (2013). Seeing human: Distinct and overlapping neural signatures associated with two forms of dehumanization. NeuroImage, 79, 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.109

Jung, C.G. (1968). Archetypes of the collective unconscious 1, In The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (R.F.C. Hull, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725642

Karlsson, F. (2011). Critical anthropomorphism and animal ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(5), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9349-8

Kearney, T. (2013). The transforming power of vulnerability. Irish Theological Quarterly, 78(3), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021140013484429

Kim, J. J. H., Betz, N., Helmuth, B., & Coley, J. D. (2023). Conceptualizing human–nature relationships: Implications of human exceptionalist thinking for sustainability and conservation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 15(3), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12653

Lestari, O. A., Sahara, R. M., Ardhini, Z. A., & Chusna, I. (2020). Mitos dan kritik lingkungan dalam film Aquaman (2018). Buletin Al-Turas, 26(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v26i1.14452

Moore, H. L., Sanders, T., & Kaare, B. (2020). Those who play with fire: Gender, fertility and transformation in East and Southern Africa. (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135555

Nelson, E. É. (2021). Lioness dreaming: A somatic approach to the animal ally. Journal of Jungian Scholarly Studies, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/jjs145s

Omarov, G., Baigunakov, D., & Sabdenova, G. (2014). The deer in iron age art in central Asia: The common trends in perception of images. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1341

Pelican, P. (2018). On Body and Soul (2017). The Postmodern Pelican. https://postmodernpelican.com/2018/03/27/on-body-and-soul-2017/

Pergadia, S. (2023). Slaughterhouse intimacies. New Literary History, 54(2), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2023.a907157

Phillips, M. (2024). Spiritual meaning of seeing 2 deer. Spiritual Meaning Portal. https://spiritualmeaningportal.com/spiritual-meaning-of-seeing-2-deer/

Porter, P. (2006). Engaging the animal in the moving image. Society and Animals, 14(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006778882411

Raissi, P., & Ghaffari, M. (2023). Ancient telling, contemporary showing: A reading of the ‘Killing of a Sacred Deer (2017)’ as film adaptation. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 11(1), 216–239. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2023.465

Rushing, J. H., & Frentz, T. S. (1980). ‘The deer hunter’: Rhetoric of the warrior. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66(4), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383537

Servais, V. (2018). Anthropomorphism in human–animal interactions: A pragmatist view. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02590

Shamshirian, V., Afhami, R., & Mehdi, A. S. (2020). Investigating the relationship between anthropomorphism and point of view by analyzing the visual structure of film in ‘Hunters and Hunted’ (2009). The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 62, 158–166. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.62.158.166

Stinchcomb, T. R., Ma, Z., & Nyssa, Z. (2022). Complex human-deer interactions challenge conventional management approaches: the need to consider power, trust, and emotion. Ecology and Society, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-12899-270113

Tricarico, G. (2016). The individuation process in post-modernity. Psychological Perspectives, 59(4), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332925.2016.1240529

Vedfelt, O. (2009). Cultivating feelings through working with dreams. Jung Journal, 3(4), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1525/jung.2009.3.4.88

Wang, P., & Chen, R. (2020). Symbolic interpretation of rare animals in movie and anime images. Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, 30(2), 908+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A624612392/IFME?u=anon~5be93a60&sid=googleScholar&xid=59c740bc

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

Surin, S. (2026). The Symbolic Significance of Deer in Ildiko Enyedi’s On Body and Soul. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 14(1), 42–67. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.698

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Spring

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
4. the Work has not previously been published;
5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.