Triangle of Sadness: Of Vulnerability and Michel Foucault's Subject-Power Concept

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2025.677

Keywords:

Foucault, power, vulnerability, Triangle of Sadness, Ruben Östlund, dichotomy

Abstract

Foucault (1977a) analyzed the concept of power from a different perspective and defined power not only as a power relationship between people and states, but as a set of strategies that is omnipresent and comes to society from multiple domains. In the phenomenon of power constructed through discourses, each individual in interrelation continues their practices while getting influenced by the process. The concept of vulnerability refers to the inner impulse that guides the actions of individuals driven by the instinct for survival, as well as the sense of vulnerability that this impulse imposes on them. Dependence on others brings a sense of vulnerability also. In this study, which is based on Foucault's concepts of subject and power, the concept of vulnerability is studied in the context of Ruben Östlund’s award-winning film Triangle of Sadness, focusing on themes of power, the transformation of authority, interpersonal relations in everyday life and vulnerability. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that gender roles and social statuses are indicators of power, individuals may experience a sense of vulnerability due to various weaknesses, the relationships between power and authority are always in a state of transformation, societal gender roles can change when the dynamics of power shift and that discourses are influential in the formation of the subject. In the analysis of the film Triangle of Sadness, critical discourse analysis, one of the qualitative research approaches, has been employed. The concept of vulnerability and Foucault’s notion of power were discussed prior to the film review.

References

Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment (J. Cumming, Trans.). New York: Herder and Herder.

Butler, J. (2010) Frames of War. When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.

Checchi, M. (2017). Resistance in vulnerability with an eye to the vulnerability of power. ephemera: theory & politics in organization, 17(4), 925-931.

Dancus, A.M., Hyvönen, M. ve Karlsson, M. (2020). Mobilizing vulnerability in Scandinavian art and culture. In A.M. Dancus, M. Hyvönen &

M. Karlsson (Eds.). Vulnerability in Scandinavian art and culture. (pp. 1-15). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Foucault, M. (1977a). Intellectuals and power. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 205–217). Cornell University Press.

Foucault, M. (1977b). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (D. F. Bouchard & S. Simon, Trans.; D. F.

Bouchard, Ed.). Cornell University Press.

Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: Volume 1 – An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. (2003a). The Birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Routledge.

Foucault, M. (2003b). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976 (M. Bertani & A. Fontana, Eds.; D. Macey, Trans.). New York: Picador.

Foucault, M. (2014). The politics of health in the eighteenth century. Foucault Studies, 18(1), 113‑127.

Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents (J. Riviere, Trans.). London: Hogarth Press.

Goffman, E. (1956). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre.

Grønstad, A. (2020). Conditional vulnerability in the films of Ruben Östlund. In A.M. Dancus, M. Hyvönen & M. Karlsson (Eds.). Vulnerability in Scandinavian Art and Culture. (pp.19-31). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Joronen M (2017) Spaces of waiting: politics of precarious recognition in the occupied West Bank. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35: 994-1011.

Joronen, M., & Rose, M. (2020). Vulnerability and its politics: Precarity and the woundedness of power. Progress in Human Geography, 45(6), 1402-1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520973444

Le Bon, G. (1896). The Crowd: A study of the popular mind (T. Fisher Unwin, Trans.). London: T. Fisher Unwin.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology (C. J. Arthur, Ed.). New York: International Publishers.

Megill, A. (1985). Prophets of extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida. University of California Press.

Mylonas, Y. (2024). Mainstreaming class (dis) contents in popular film and TV series: HBO’s The White Lotus (S1) and Ruben Östlund’s Triangle of Sadness. Journal of Class & Culture, 3(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1386/jclc_00045_1

Östlund, R. (Director), & Bober, P., & Hemmendorff, E. (Producers). (2022). Triangle of Sadness [Film]. Sweden, Germany, France, United Kingdom: BBC Film, Imperative Entertainment, Swedish Film Institute.

Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. SAGE Publications.

Q with Tom Power (October 7, 2022). Ruben Östlund on Triangle of Sadness and why he wanted to look at “beauty as a currency”. Video. Retrieved from YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TV4h13n4KRc&t=249s

Rose M (2014) Negative governance: vulnerability, biopolitics and the origins of government. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39: 209-223.

Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.

Sirman, N. When Antigone is a man feminist “trouble” in the late colony. In J. Butler, Z. Gambetti & L. Sabsay (Eds.). (2016). Vulnerability in resistance. (pp. 191-210). ABD: Duke University Press.

Touraine, A. (1995). Critique of modernity (D. Macey, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage, 95-120.

Vanity Fair (October 10, 2022). “Triangle of Sadness” director breaks down a dinner date scene. video. Retrieved from YouTube. https, s.//www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDBMoCdktHY

Downloads

Published

2025-05-27

How to Cite

Özer, B., & Özer, N. P. (2025). Triangle of Sadness: Of Vulnerability and Michel Foucault’s Subject-Power Concept. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 13(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2025.677

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Winter

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Beril Özer

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.