The Ultimately Determinant Role of Economy in Yilmaz Güney's Movies: An Essay From the Perspective of Marxist Theory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2024.622

Keywords:

Yılmaz Güney, Marxism, Economy, Class Differences, Inequality

Abstract

The study examines a different aspect of the films of actor, screenwriter, and director Yılmaz Güney, who brought a new sense of reality to Turkish cinema. Güney's film Umut (The Hope), which he acted and directed in 1970, is a turning point for Yılmaz Güney cinema and Turkish cinema. The breath of Marxism can be felt in almost all of Yılmaz Güney's films after The Hope. In his films, Güney aimed to convey to the audience the fundamental contradictions of Turkish capitalism, the socioeconomic inequalities it created, and the resulting class differences. It can be argued that Güney's films discussed within the scope of the study Umut, 1970 (The Hope), Endişe, 1974 (The Anxiety), Sürü, 1978 (The Herd), Düşman, 1979 (The Enemy) focus on social class differences in the capitalist system by relying on Marxist ideology. Although the reasons for these differences in the movies are associated with factors such as politics, ideology, religion, culture, family, and education, it is thought that the most significant share of the factors that play a role in the formation of social classes is given to the economy. The study started with the problem of proving this claim. The films discussed within the study's scope revealed that the economy is the critical factor determining social class differences.

Author Biography

Betül Sarı Aksakal, Manisa Celal Bayar University

I was born in 1991 in İzmir. I graduated from Ege University, Department of Economics in 2013. Then I completed my master's degree at Hacettepe University Department of Economics in English. I still continue my doctorate education at the same university and department. At the same time, I have been working as a Research Assistant at the Department of Economics of Manisa Celal Bayar University for 4 years. I have previously worked at Dicle University and Hacettepe University Department of Economics. I mainly study subjects such as Political Economy, Economic History, and Economic Thought. Another area of my interest is Cinema. I continue to work in the axis of Cinema, Economics, Politics and Sociology.

References

Akbulut, H. (2012). Yeşilçam’dan Türk Sinemasına Melodramatik İmgelem. İstanbul: Hayalperest.

Algan, N. (2011). Yılmaz Güney ve Toplumsal Sınıflar. in N. Süalp, A. Güneş and Z. Süalp (Eds.), Sınıf İlişkileri Sureti Soldurulmuş Bir Resim mi? pp. 193-212. İstanbul: Bağlam.

Althusser, L. (2002). Marx İçin. (Trs. I. Ergüden). İstanbul: İthaki.

Althusser, L. (2014). İdeoloji ve Devletin İdeolojik Aygıtları, (Trs. A. Tümertekin). İstanbul: İthaki.

Armes, R. (1987). Third World Film Making and the West. University of California Press.

Armes, R. (2011). Sinema ve Gerçeklik. (Trs. Z. Ö. Barkot). İstanbul: Doruk.

Boratav, K. (2006). Türkiye İktisat Tarihi: 1908-2005. İstanbul: İmge.

Bottomore, T. (1983). A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bottomore, T. (2002). Marksist Düşünce Sözlüğü. (Trs. M. Tunçay). İstanbul: İletişim.

Bowles, S. (1985). Post-Marxian Economics: Labour, Learning and History. Social Science Information, 24(3), 507-528.

Daldal, A. (2021). Toplumsaldan Bireysele Türk Sinemasından Parçalar: Umut, Distopya, Siyaset. İstanbul: H20.

Diken Yücel, D. (2021). Türk Sinemasında Toplumsal Gerçekçilik Serüveni: Toplumsal Gerçekçilikten Toplumsal Kaderciliğe. Ankara: Akademisyen.

Dorsay, A. (1988). Yılmaz Güney Kitabı. İstanbul: Varlık.

Dorsay, A. (2005). Yılmaz Güney Kitabı. İstanbul: Güney.

Engels, F. (1978). Letter to Joseph Bloch. In R.C. Tucker (Ed.) in The Marx-Engels Reader, pp. 760-765. New York & London: W.W. Norton.

Fülberth, Georg. (2018). Kapitalizmin Kısa Tarihi. (Trs. Sadık Usta). İstanbul: Yordam.

Güney, Yılmaz (2004). İnsan, Militan ve Sanatçı Yılmaz Güney. İstanbul, Güney.

Jessop, B. (1982). The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

Kuyucak Esen, Ş. (2018). 80ler Türkiyesi’nde Sinema. İstanbul: Su Yayınevi.

Kuyucak Esen, Ş. (2020). Yılmaz Güney Sineması Çukurova Gerçeğinin Estetiği. İstanbul: Su.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1848). Manifesto of the Communist Party, in MECW 6, 477-519.

Marx, K. (1967). Capital: A critique of political economy. New York: International Publishers.

Marx, K. (1970). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. New York: International Publishers

Marx, K. (1976) Capital, Vol I. (Trs. B. Fowkes). New York: Vintage.

Marx, K. (1979). Ekonomi Politiğin Eleştirisine Katkı. (Trs. S. Belli). Ankara: Sol.

Marx, K. (2004). Grundrisse Ekonomi Politiğin Eleştirisinin Temelleri. (Trs. A. Gelen) Ankara: Sol.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (2014). Komünist Manifesto. (Trs. M. Belge). Ankara: Nilüfer.

Mouzelis, N. P. (1990). Post-Marxist Alternatives: The Construction of Social Orders. London: Macmillan.

Obsorne, P. (2023). Marx’ı Nasıl Okumalıyız? (Trs. G. Göçhan). İstanbul: Runik.

Onaran, A. Ş. (1994). Türk Sineması. Ankara: Kitle.

Özden, Z. (2004). Film Eleştirisi: Film Eleştirisinde Temel Yaklaşımlar ve Tür Filmi Eleştirisi. İstanbul: İmge.

Özön, N. (1995). Karagözden Sinemaya: Türk Sineması ve Sorunları. Ankara: Kitle.

Ryan, M. amd Kellner, D. (2016). Politik Kamera Çağdaş Hollywood Sinemasının İdeolojisi ve Politikası. (Trs. E. Özsayar). İstanbul: Ayrıntı.

Soner, A. (2005). Herkes O‘ndan Söz Ediyor. İstanbul: Güney.

Suner, A. (2006) Hayalet Ev: Yeni Türk Sinemasında Aidiyet, Kimlik ve Bellek. İstanbul: Metis.

Topakkaya, A. (2009). Tarihsel Materyalizm ve Diyalektik. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(27), 65-78.

Topçu, A.D. (2006). Türk Sineması’nda Sınıfların Temsili: Dönemsel Bir İnceleme. In 2. Sınıf Çalışmaları Sempozyumu. Türkiye’yi Sınıf Gerçeğiyle Anlamak. pp. 118-125 İstanbul: Sav.

Tugen, B. (2014). 1960-1980 Darbeleri Arasında Türk Sinemasında Düşünce Oluşumu ve Filmlerin Sosyolojik Görünümleri. 21. Yüzyılda Eğitim Ve Toplum Eğitim Bilimleri ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(7), 159-175.

Ucakan, M. (1977). Türk Sinemasında İdeoloji. Istanbul: Dusunce.

Wayne, M. (2001). Political Film: The dialectics of Third Cinema. London: Pluto.

Wood, E. M. (2008). Kapitalizm Demokrasiye Karşı: Tarihsel Maddeciliğin Yeniden Yorumlanması. (Trs. Ş. Artan). İstanbul: Yordam.

Wright, E. O. (2014). Sınıf Analizine Yaklaşımlar. (Trs. V. S. Ö). Ankara: Notabene.

Yıldırım, E. (2018). İdeolojik ve Estetik Boyutuyla Politik Sinema. İstanbul: Atlas.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-03

How to Cite

Sarı Aksakal, B. (2024). The Ultimately Determinant Role of Economy in Yilmaz Güney’s Movies: An Essay From the Perspective of Marxist Theory. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 12(2), 93–143. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2024.622

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Fall

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Betül Sarı Aksakal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.