“not conducive for sobriety”: Sex Addiction and Neoliberal Masculinity in Don Jon and Thanks for Sharing

Authors

  • Joel Gwynne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2021.320

Keywords:

sexuality, masculinity, pornography, addiction, neoliberalism

Abstract

Thanks for Sharing (2012) and Don Jon (2013), share similarities in their representation of the lives of unmarried men who are all approaching midlife, and who are all struggling to build meaningful, monogamous, long term attachments with women. In Thanks for Sharing, Adam (Mark Ruffalo) is addicted to brief encounters with numerous partners in contexts devoid of emotional intimacy, while a fellow member of his sex addicts support group, Neil (Josh Gad), struggles with a compulsion to touching strangers in public locations. In counterpoint, Don Jon charts the protagonist’s insatiable consumption of online pornography, since Jon believes that the virtual domain provides a far superior sexual experience than anything, he could find in real life encounters with women. This article is concerned with the relationship between sex addiction and masculinity, and how neoliberalism is imbued in the characters’ embodiment of masculinity regardless of their divergent social backgrounds.

References

Apostolidis, P. and J.A. Williams. (2017). ‘Sex Scandals, Reputational Management and Masculinity under Neoliberal Conditions’. Sexualities 20(7): 793-814.

Armengol, J. M. (2013). Embodying Masculinities: Towards a History of the Male Body in U.S. Culture and Literature. New York: Peter Lang.

Bainbridge, C., & Yates, C. (2005). Cinematic symptoms of masculinity in transition: Memory, history and mythology in contemporary film. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 10(3), 299-318.

Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western Culture and the Body. University of California Press.

Breward, C. (2001). ‘Manliness, Modernity and the Shaping of Male Clothing’. Body Dressing. Edited by J. Entwistle and E. Wilson. Oxford: Berg, 165-181.

Burchell, G., C. Gordon and P. Miller (1991). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. University of Chicago Press.

Butler, J. (2006). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.

Cheng, C. (1999). Marginalized masculinities and hegemonic masculinity: An introduction. The Journal of men’s studies, 7(3), 295-315.

Collier, M. (1998). Masculinities, Crime and Criminology: Men, Heterosexuality and the Criminal(ised) Other. London: Sage Publications.

Connell, R, and J. W. Messerschmidt. (2005) ‘Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept’. Gender and Society 19:6, 829-859.

Cornwall, A. (2016). ‘Introduction: masculinities under neoliberalism’. Masculinities under Neoliberalism. Edited by A. Cornwall. London: Zed Books, 1-28.

Davis, K. (2002) ‘Dubious Equalities and Embodied Difference: Men, Women, and Cosmetic Surgery.’ Body & Society 8:1, 49–65.

de Beauvoir, S. (1975). The Second Sex. Knopf.

Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.

Demetriou, D. Z. (2001). Connell's concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory and Society, 30(3), 337-361.

Donaldson, M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity?. Theory and Society, 22(5), 643-657.

Feasey, R. (2008). Masculinity and Popular Television. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fox, A. (2016) ‘The New Anglo-American Cinema of Sexual Addiction’. Transgression in Anglo- American Cinema: Gender, Sex and the Deviant Body. Edited by J. Gwynne. New York: Columbia University Press, 9-23.

Genz, S. and B. A. Brabon. (2009). Postfeminism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Gill, S. (2008) Power and Resistance in the New World Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McDowell, L. (1991). Life Without Father and Ford: The New Gender Order of Post-Fordism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16:4), 400–419.

Neale, S. (1983). Masculinity as Spectacle: Reflections on Men and Mainstream Cinema. Screen, 24(6), 2-17.

Orbach, S. (2009). Bodies. London: Profile Books.

Reeser, T.W. (2011) Masculinities in Theory: An Introduction. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

Reilly, A. and S. Cosbey, (2008). ‘The Fashion of the Man’s Suit’. Men’s Fashion Reader. London: Fairchild Books, 495-497.

Ringrose, J. (2013). Postfeminist Education? Girls and the sexual politics of schooling. Abingdon: Routledge.

Rose, N. (1992). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.

Shone, T. (2014). ‘Nymphomaniac, The Wolf of Wall Street and Cinema's Bad Sex Renaissance’, The Guardian, 19 March 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/mar/19/nymphomaniacwolf-

wall-street-cinemas-bad-sex-renaissance?CMP=fb_us.

Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, Self, and Culture. London: Routledge.

Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.

Stahl, G., J. D. Nelson and D. O. Wallace. (2017). Masculinity and Aspiration in an Era of Neoliberal Education: International Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Tanner, C. (2013). ‘Fitness, ‘Wellbeing’ and the Beauty-Health Nexus.’ Vanity: 21st Century Selves. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 60-87.

Tauss, A. (2012). ‘Contextualizing the Current Crisis: Post-fordism, Neoliberal Restructuring, and Financialization.’ Colombia Internacional 76, 51-79.

Tse lon, E. (2001). ‘From Fashion to Masquerade: Towards an Ungendered Paradigm.’ Body Dressing. Edited by J. Entwistle and E. Wilson. Oxford: Berg, 103-120.

Tudor, D. (2011). ‘Twenty first Century Neoliberal Man.’ Neoliberalism and Global Cinema: Capital, Culture, and Marxist Critique. Edited by J. Kapur and K. B. Wagner, London and New York: Routledge, 57-68.

Turner, B. (2008). The Body & Society: Explorations in Social Theory. London: Sage Publications.

Weeks, K. (2011). The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Whelehan, I. (2000). Overloaded: Popular Culture and the Future of Feminism. London: Women’s Press.

Whitehead, S. M. and F. Barrett. (2001). The Masculinities Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Willett, Rebekah. (2008). ‘Consumer Citizens Online: Structure, agency and gender in online participation’. Youth, Identity and Digital Media. Edited by D. Buckingham. MIT Press, pp. 49-70.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-14

How to Cite

Gwynne, J. (2021). “not conducive for sobriety”: Sex Addiction and Neoliberal Masculinity in Don Jon and Thanks for Sharing. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 9(1), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2021.320

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Spring 2021

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.