Portrayal of Women in Contemporary Nollywood Films: Isoken and King of Boys in Focus

Authors

  • Emwinromwankhoe Osakpolor University of Benin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2021.299

Keywords:

Portrayal, women, Nollywood, Nollywood films, Isoken, King of Boys

Abstract

This study investigates the portrayal of women in contemporary Nollywood films, using Isoken (2017) and King of Boys (2018) as case studies. The objective was to highlight the various ways in which women in the films are portrayed to viewers and ascertain whether contemporary Nollywood movies are an improvement on the issues of gender stereotypes and sexism which are hitherto prevalent in the industry. Anchored on the cultivation theory, the study adopted the qualitative content analysis method. Findings showed that women in the studied films are negatively portrayed in various ways and that these portrayals are, at best, parallel to the stereotypical ways in which women were portrayed in previous Nollywood movies. Taking cognizance of the fact that both films are directed by women, the researcher recommends that Nollywood female directors should look beyond the lenses of financial gains and set a pace with regards to changing the narrative and portraying Nigerian women in a positive light.

References

Abbah, A. (2008). One step forward, two steps backward: African women in Nigerian video film. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(4), 335-357.

Adamu, A. (2007). Currying favour: Eastern media influences and the Hausa video film. Film International, 5(4), 77-89.

Afolabi, O. & Oyero, O. (2010). Nollywood and the Nigeria’s national image: A study of some selected Nollywood movies (2010-2016). A Paper presented at the Covenant University Conference on E-Governance in Nigeria, Ota, Ogun State, June 7-9.

Agbese, A. (2010). Seeing the agenda for women’s liberation or empowerment in Nigeria through movies: An analysis of Women’s Cot, Women in Power and The Bank Manager. Journal of Cultural and Media Studies, 2(1), 73-78.

Aromona, O. (2016). Portrayal of African women in Nollywood films over a five-year period: A content analysis of traits applying the stereotype content model. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Accessed at http://dc.etsu.eedu/etd/3166.

Asemah, E., Nwammuo, A. & Uwaoma, A. (2017). Theories and Models of Communication. Jos: Jos University Press.

Brock, N. (2009). Representations of Nigerian women in Nollywood film. Unpublished PhD Thesis Submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies, Howard University.

Elegbe, O. (2017). Women Trauma and Stereotype Tradition in Tunde Kelani’s Film, Thunderbolt. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 6(2), 144-164.

Dehchenari, M., Abdullah, M. & Eng, W. (2014). A critical and semiotic analysis of the shift in women’s erotic and romantic roles in action movies and movie posters across three eras of Hollywood. Journal of Innovation Education and Research, 2(6), 25-39.

Duru, A. (2013). Ideological criticism of a Nigerian video film, August Meeting: A Feminist Perspective. Accessed at http://ejournalist.com.au/vion2/duru.pdf.

Ekwuazi, H. (2007). The Hausa video film: The call of the Muezzin. Film International, (4), 64-70.

Gallagher, M. (1995). Communication and human dignity: A women’s rights perspective. Media Development, 13, 6-9.

Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media (2015). Cinema and society; Shaping Our Worldview beyond the Lens: Investigation on the Impact of Gender Representation in Nigerian Films. Accessed at http://seejane.org/wp-content/uploads/cinema-and-society.

Harrison, K. (2003). Television viewers’ ideal body proportions: The case of the curvaceously thin woman. Sex Roles, 48(5), 225-264.

Haynes, J. & Okome, O. (1998). Evolving popular media: Nigerian video films. African Literatures, 29(3), 106-128.

Hernandez, E. (2012). Using cultivation theory to analyse college student attitudes about the dating process following exposure to romantic films. Unpublished M.A. Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University.

Ibbi, A. (2017). Stereotype representation of women in Nigerian films. Cinej Cinema Journal, 6(2), 49-70.

Ibrahim, M. (2013). Hausa film: Compatible or incompatible with Islam? Performing Islam, 2(2), 165-179.

Johnson, A. (2011). Cultivation Theory of Mass Media. Accessed at http://augusttusjohnton.

Jurfi, M. & Dahiru, J. (2020). Muslim identity in Nigeria’s cinematic culture: Analysis of select films in Nollywood and Kannywood film industry. GVU Journal of Communication Studies, 1, 116-126.

Kumwenda, G. (2007). The portrayal of witchcraft, occults and magic in popular Nigerian video films. Unpublished Masters Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Arts, University of Witwaterstrand.

Langford, T. & Mackinnon, N. (2000). The affective bases for the gendering of traits: Comparing the United States and Canada. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 34-48.

Matei, S. (2012). Communication Theory and Mass Communication Research from Left to Right. Accessed at http://matei.org/ithink/2012//11/08/cultivation-theory-and-mass-communication-research-from-left-to-right.

Morgan, M., Signorielli, N. and Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In Bryant, J. & Oliver, M. (Eds.). Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge.

Nwuneli, O., Okoye, I., Okunna, C. & Ayo, J. (1993). Media use, knowledge of world affairs and image of nations among Nigerian youths. Africa Media Review, 7(1), 33-49.

Ogunranti, C. (1981). The role portrayal of women in television advertisement: The Nigerian case. Unpublished Masters Dissertation Submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies, University of Lagos.

Okunna, C. (1996). Portrayal of women in Nigerian home video films: Empowerment or Subjugation? Africa Media Review, 10(3), 21-36.

Okuyade, O. (2011). Women and evangelical merchandising in the Nigerian filmic enterprise. Kemanusiaan, 18(1), 1-14.

Olupohunda, B. (2013). Stop the Violence against Nigerian Women in Nollywood. Accessed at http://www.secureavaaz.org/en/petition/stop-the-violence.

Omatsola, D. (2016). The semiotics of feminism and Nigeria’s cultural identity in Nollywood: Women’s Cot in Focus. Covenant Journal of Communication, 3(1), 1-22.

Onyenankeya, K., Onyenankeya, O. & Osukunle, O. (2019). Sexism and gender profiling: Two decades of stereotypical portrayal of women in Nollywood films. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 20(2), 73-90.

Perkins, T. (2000). Who (and what) is it for? In Christian, G. and Linda, W. (Eds.). Reinventing Film Studies (pp. 112-126). New York: Oxford University Press.

Ukata, A. (2010). Conflicting framings of women in Nollywood videos. African Nebula, 1(1), 67-75.

Uzuegbunam, C. and Ononiwu, C. (2018). Highlighting racial discrimination in 3D animated films and its implications: A semiotic analysis of Frankenweenie. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public relations, 20(2), 5-20.

Vinney, C. (2019). Cultivation theory. Accessed at http://www.thoughtco.com/cultivation-theory-definition-4588455.

Zaharopoulos, T. (2001). Traditional family relationships and television viewing in Greece. TBS Archives, 6, 8-16.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-14

How to Cite

Osakpolor, E. (2021). Portrayal of Women in Contemporary Nollywood Films: Isoken and King of Boys in Focus. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 9(1), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2021.299

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Spring 2021

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.