An Analysis of Ritwik Ghatak’s Bari Theke Paliye From the Perspective of Exile, Childhood, and Architecture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.1112Keywords:
Ritwik Ghatak, Bari Theke Paliye, childhood, urban space, displacement, architecture, Partition, Kolkata, Bengali cinemaAbstract
This article examines Ritwik Ghatak’s Bari Theke Paliye (1959) through childhood, displacement, and the built environment. Through qualitative close analysis of domestic interiors, streets, bridges, and encounters, it asks how a child’s changing sense of place reveals urban inequality. Kanchan’s voluntary flight from his village differs from Partition-era forced migration, yet his encounters with displaced adults connect the journey to histories of lost livelihoods and belonging. The film contrasts the city’s promise of freedom with precarious work, anonymity, and collective violence. Architecture emerges as an active force that can discipline, shelter, exclude, or enable connection; home and city remain ambivalent rather than fixed opposites.
References
Abbasuddin, S., & Alfarid Hussain, S. M. (2026). Locating the cultural geography of Kolkata’s Cinema Para: From single-screen film theatres to cinemallisation. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 14(1), 512–547. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.846
Ajdukovic, M., & Ajdukovic, D. (1998). Impact of displacement on the psychological well-being of refugee children. International Review of Psychiatry, 10(3), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540269874763
Banerjee, S. (2023). Reading bhadralok cultural memory, kitsch and culture industry in Ritwik Ghatak’s films. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 11(2), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2023.422
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Pearson.
Bhattacharya, I. (2021). Sound and the masters: The aural in Indian art cinema. Studies in South Asian Film & Media, 12(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1386/safm_00037_1
Burman, P. (2022). Historical overview of Bengal and social exclusion. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research, 7(10), 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.56975/ijsdr.v7i10.202427
Çakmakçı, M., & Yıldız, S. (2022). Çocuğun odası ile ilişkisinin esneklik kavramı üzerinden incelenmesi [An examination of the child’s relationship with his/her room through the concept of flexibility]. bab Journal of FSMVU Faculty of Architecture and Design, 3(1), 42–54. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/babdergisi/article/1065000
Cayabyab, C. R., O’Reilly, P., Murphy, A.-M., & O’Gorman, C. (2020). Psychological morbidity among forcibly displaced children—A literature review. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 189, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02186-7
Chen, S., Carver, A., Sugiyama, T., & Knöll, M. (2021). Built-environment attributes associated with refugee children’s physical activity: A narrative review and research agenda. Conflict and Health, 15, Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00393-2
Chowdhury, S. (2015). The Indian partition and the making of a new scopic regime in Bengali cinema. European Journal of English Studies, 19(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2015.1091220
Dass, M. (2017). Unsettling images: Cinematic theatricality in the cinema of Ritwik Ghatak. Screen, 58(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjx008
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1980)
Erdem, S. (2026). Partition as historical novum: Cognitive estrangement in Ritwik Ghatak’s Partition Trilogy. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 14(2), 658–686. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.955
Francis, S. P. (2026). History, affect and memory in Ghatak’s Subarnarekha. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 14(2), 634–657. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.909
Ghatak, R. (Director). (1959). Bari Theke Paliye [The runaway] [Film]. L.B. Films International; Chitrakalpa.
Guha, A. (2025). Bari Theke Paliye: A play between empirical reality and magical realism. Open-ended. https://www.academia.edu/127124871/Bari_theke_paliye_a_play_between_empirical_reality_and_magical_realism
Hacıoğlu, E. (2025). The meaning of new building–place relationships: A multi-dimensional framework based on experience. Urban Design International. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-025-00284-5
Hutnyk, J. (2023). Tomar naam, amar naam, Vietnam Vietnam! Folk styles and solidarity in the Bengali new wave cinema. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 24(3), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2023.2209434
Kurian, R. R., & Navaneeth, P. (2025). Reading the representations of children and childhood(s) in Malayalam films. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 13(1), 67–100. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2025.655
Kurtulmus, B., & Yıldız, S. (2025). The interplay of water, space, and human behaviour: Urban morphology by means of urban palimpsest and juxtaposition concepts at the Bosphorus. Journal of Salutogenic Architecture, 4(1), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.38027/jsalutogenic_vol4no1_12
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)
O’Donnell, E. (2004). “Woman” and “homeland” in Ritwik Ghatak’s films: Constructing post-Independence Bengali cultural identity. Jump Cut, 47. https://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc47.2005/ghatak/text.html
Özçetin, P. S., & Rottmann, S. B. (2022). (Lived) spaces of belonging, culture, and gender: Syrian refugees in Istanbul. Space and Culture, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312221089213
Pakih, Y. E. (2026). Çocukların bilişsel gelişiminde mekânın önemi: Yenilikçi deneyim mekânı tasarımı [The importance of space in children’s cognitive development: Innovative experiential space design]. Kentsel ve Yapılı Çevrede Çocuk Araştırmaları Dergisi (J-CUBE), 2(1), 41–57.
Parviainen, H., Lämsä, R., Kiviruusu, O., & Santalahti, P. (2022). Parenting in place: The reception centre as the spatial context for laying the foundations for asylum-seeking children’s healthy development. Health & Place, 76, Article 102823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102823
Raychaudhuri, A. (2009). Resisting the resistible: Re-writing myths of partition in the works of Ritwik Ghatak. Social Semiotics, 19(4), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330903361158
Sampson, R., & Gifford, S. M. (2010). Place-making, settlement and well-being: The therapeutic landscapes of recently arrived youth with refugee backgrounds. Health & Place, 16, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.09.004
Sanyal, R. (2009). Contesting refugeehood: Squatting as survival in post-partition Calcutta. Social Identities, 15(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630802692937
Sarkar, B. (2009). Mourning the nation: Indian cinema in the wake of partition. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392217
Sen, U. (2018). Citizen refugee: Forging the Indian nation after partition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348553
Seyhan, Ç., & Bülbül Arıoğlu, Ş. (2025). Çocukların mekân algısında Lynch’in imgesel elemanlarına dayalı olarak algısal tercihlerin ve hiyerarşinin değerlendirilmesi [An assessment of perceptual preferences and hierarchies in children’s spatial perception based on Lynch’s image elements]. Kentsel ve Yapılı Çevrede Çocuk Araştırmaları Dergisi (J-CUBE), 1(1), 3–16. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcube/article/1618168
Sinha, A. (2023). Cities for children. Tekton: A Journal of Architecture, Urban Design and Planning, 10(2), 8–14.
Trivedi, G. (2026). The nation’s unfinished business: Caste, exile, and postcolonial betrayal in Ritwik Ghatak’s Subarnarekha. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 14(2), 730–746. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.1022
Vahali, D. O. (2018). Partition and the betrayal of India’s independence: An analysis of Ritwik Ghatak’s cinema. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 76, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.recaesin.2018.76.07
Veronese, G., Sousa, C., Cavazzoni, F., & Shoman, H. (2020). Spatial agency as a source of resistance and resilience among Palestinian children living in Dheisheh refugee camp, Palestine. Health & Place, 62, Article 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102304
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6th ed.) [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ersan Yıldız

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
This journal is published by 