Control and Resistance in the Heterotopic Spatiality of Pleasantville

Evrim ERSÖZ KOÇ

Abstract


Pleasantville presents the experience of the teenage twins David and Jennifer who are transported to the 1950s TV soap opera named Pleasantville via the TV remote control. The twins introduce free sex, arts, literature, rock and roll, and jazz to this perfected town in which residents live in order. This clash of cultures results in social unrest as the residents become aware that the order is an outcome of submission and challenge the roles attributed to them. The transformation from control to resistance is the dominant motif of the film. Using Foucault’s theory of heterotopia, this study scrutinizes how the heterotopian principles in the spatial presentations provide a good lens to negotiate forms of control and resistance. 


Keywords


Foucault, heterotopia, Pleasantville, control, resistance

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Aichele, George. “Sitcom Mythology.” In Screening Scripture: Intertextual Connections between Scripture and Film, edited by George Aichele and Richard Walsh, 100-119. Harrisburg: Trinity, 2002.

Armstrong, Richard. “Where Am I Going to See Colours like That?: Bliss, Desire and the Paintbox in Pleasantville.” Screen Education 52 (2008): 155-160.

Bartling, Hugh. “Tourism as Everyday Life: an Inquiry into The Villages, Florida.” Tourism Geographies: An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment 8, no. 4 (2006): 380-402.

Beuka, Robert. “‘Cue the Sun’: Soundings from Millennial Suburbia.” Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies 3 (Fall 2003): 154-171.

Belton, John. “Painting by the Numbers: The Digital Intermediate.” Film Quarterly 61, no. 3 (Spring 2008): 58-65.

Deacy, Christopher. “Paradise Lost or Paradise Learned?: Sin and Salvation in Pleasantville.” In Mediating Religion: Conversations in Media, Religion and Culture, edited by Jolyon P. Mitchell and Sophia Marriage, 201-210. T&T Clark, London, 2003.

Dehaene, Michiel and Lieven de Cauter. Introduction to Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society, Edited by Michiel Dehaene and Lieven De Cauter. London: Routledge, 2008.

Dickinson, Greg. “The Pleasantville Effect: Nostalgia and the Visual Framing of (White) Suburbia.” Western Journal of Communication 70, no. 3 (2006): 212-233.

Doron, Dill. “‘… Those Marvellous Empty Zones at the Edge of the Cities’ Heterotopia and the ‘Dead Zone’.” In Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society, edited by Michiel Dehaene and Lieven De Cauter, 203-213. London: Routledge, 2008.

Egginton, William. “Reality is Bleeding: A Brief History of Film from the Sixteenth

Century.” Configurations 9, no. 2 (Spring 2001): 207-229.

Gabbard, Krin. “Passing Tones: The Talented Mr. Ripley and Pleasantville.” In Black Magic: White Hollywood and African American Culture, 73-105. Piscataway: Rutgers UP, 2004.

Gallardo, Pere. “The Road to Perdition is Paved in Technicolor.” In Trans/Forming Utopia: The ‘Small Thin Story,’ edited by Elizabeth Russell, 217-226. Bern: Peter Lang, 2009.

Gordon, Joan. “Hybridity, Heterotopia, and Mateship in China Miéville's ‘Perdido Street Station.’” Science Fiction Studies 30, no. 3, (Nov., 2003): 456-476.

Grainge, Paul. “Colouring the Past: Pleasantville and the Textuality of Media Memory.” In Memory and Popular Film, 202-219. New York: Manchester UP, 2003.

Hetherington, Kevin. The Badlands of Modernity: Heterotopia and Social Ordering. London: Routledge, 1997.

---. “Foucault, The Museum and the Diagram.” The Sociological Review 59, no.3 (2011): 457-475.

Heynen, Hilde. “Heterotopia Unfolded.” In Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society, edited by Michiel Dehaene and Lieven De Cauter, 311-323. London: Routledge, 2008.

Higgins, Scott. “A New Colour Consciousness: Colour in the Digital Age.” Convergence 9, no. 4 (Dec., 2003): 60-76.

Hook, Derek and Michele Vrdoljak. “Fear and Loathing in Northern Johannesburg: The Security Park as Heterotopia.” PINS 27 (2001): 61-83.

---.“Gated communities, heterotopia and a ‘rights’ of privilege: A heterrotopolgy of the South African Secuirty-park.” Geoforum 33(2002): 195-219.

Jacobs, Del. Interrogating the Image: Movies and the World of Film and Television. Lanham: University Press of America, 2009.

Johnson, Peter. “The Geographies of Heterotopia.” Geography Compass 7, no. 11 (2013): 790-803.

--- “Unravelling Foucault’s ‘Different Spaces’.” History of the Human Sciences 19, no. 4 (2006): 75-90.

Mercadante, Linda A. “The God behind the Screen: Pleasantville & The Truman Show.” Journal of Religion and Film 5, no. 2 (October 2001): n.p.

Muzzio, Douglas and Thomas Halper. ‘‘Pleasantville? The Suburb and its Representation in American Movies.” Urban Affairs Review 37 (2002): 543–74.

Reinhartz, Adele. Scripture on the Silver Screen. Louisville: John Knox Press, 1990.

Foucault, Michel. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16, no. 1 (1986): 22–27.

Reynaud, Patricia. “Simple Minds, Complex Distinctions: Reading Forrest Gump and Pleasantville through the Lens of Bourdieu’s Sociologocial Theory.” In Memory and Representation: Constructed Truths and Competing Realities, edited by Dena E. Eber and Arthur G. Neal, 127-138. Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 2001.

Saldanha, Arun. “Heterotopia and structuralism.” Environment and Planning 40 (2008): 2080 -2096.

Samuels, Joshua. “Of Other Scapes: Archaeology, Landscape, and Heterotopia in Fascist Sicily.” Archeologies 6, no. 1 (2010): 62-81.

Soja, Edward. Thirdspace. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.

Walters, James R. “Rehearsal Space: Pleasantville (Gary Ross, 1998).” In Alternative Worlds in Holywood Cinema: Resonance between Realms, 191-213. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2008.

Winkler, Martin M. “Chronotope and Locus Amoenus in Daphnis and Chloe and Pleasantville.” In Space in the Ancient Novel. Ancient Narrative Supplementum 1, edited by Michael Paschalis and Stavros Frangoulidis, 27-39. Groningen: Barkhuis & The University Library Groningen, 2002.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2015.125

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 CINEJ Cinema Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 New articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

 

This journal is published by the University Library System, University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.

 

ISSN 2159-2411 (print) 2158-8724 (online)