Cinema: Not Frames But Veils

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2021.312

Keywords:

Window, Frame, Passe-partout, Veil, Decor

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to rethink the metaphors of the cinema as window and frame. The first one addresses the cinema as a transparent, open window that faithfully reproduces the world, taking the spectator’s view beyond the screen guided by realism and indexicality. The second one takes the screen as a rectangular surface that focuses the audience’s eye on the images that are produced inside its borders. In these pages I will revisit both notions, adding a third one inspired by the passe-partout of Derrida: the cinema as veil, also theorized as backdrop and decor. Ultimately, this approach explores the idea of simulacrum by analizing two examples: Blue (Apichatpong Weerasethakul, 2018) and Decor (Ahmad Abdalla, 2014).

References

Arnheim, R. (1997). Film as Art. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Barthes, R. (2010). Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill and Wang.

Baudrillard, J. (2001). “Simulacra and Simulations”. In Mark Poster (Ed.), Selected Writings (169-187). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bazin, A. (1967). What is Cinema?, I. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Bazin, A. (1971). What is Cinema?, II. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Daney, S. (1998). “Cours des miracles”. In Ciné Journal 1983-86, II (73-77). Paris: Cahiers du Cinéma, Collection Petite Bibliothèque.

Daney, S. (1996). La Rampe: Cahier Critique 1970-1982. Paris: Cahiers du Cinéma, Collection Petite Bibliothèque.

Daney, S. & Oudart, J.-P. (1996). “Work, Reading, Pleasure” [“On Salator”]. In Nick Browne (Ed.), Cahiers du Cinéma 1969-72, III. The Politics of Representation (115-136). London: Routledge.

Derrida, J. (1987). The Truth in Painting. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

Elsaesser, T. & Hagener, M. (2015). Film Theory: An Introduction through the Senses. New York, London: Routledge.

Heidegger, M. (2001). Being and Time. Oxford UK, Cambridge US: Blackwell Publishers.

Heidegger, M. (2002). “The Origin of the Work of Art”. In Off the Beaten Track (1-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Koskela, J. (2012). “Truth as Unconcealment in Heidegger’s Being and Time”. Minerva. An Internet Journal of Philosophy, 16, 116-128.

http://www.minerva.mic.ul.ie/vol16/Heidegger.pdf

Lebedev, O. (2016). “La robe sans couture de la réalité: André Bazin et l’apologie du réalisme cinématographique”. Bulletin d’analyse phénoménologique, XII(4.9): 189-209. https://popups.uliege.be/1782-2041/index.php?id=891&file=1&pid=870

Nietzsche, F. (2008). The Gay Science. Edited by Bernard Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schopenhauer, A. (2010). The World as Will and Representation, I. Edited by Christopher Janaway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wollen, P. (1972). Signs and Meaning in the Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-07-14

How to Cite

Molina Barea, M. del C. (2021). Cinema: Not Frames But Veils. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 9(1), 146–180. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2021.312

Issue

Section

Articles