Star Wars: The Force Awakens [the Western Pleasure Principle]
Keywords:marketing, branding, psychoanalysis, Star Wars
It is difficult to identify the contradictions that serve as the foundation for value propositions in the cultural branding model. To address this, I propose the use of psychoanalysissto analyze market- and cultural-level collectives. To demonstrate, I analyze a recent installment in the popular film franchise Star Wars in order to demonstrate how extant product preferences can be used as subjects of analysis much like dream images in traditional psychoanalysis. I find that the western market which enjoys the films likely does so due to a defense mechanism known as inversion. On the market level, this offers opportunities for identity-related branding. Implications for the cultural branding model and commercial mythologizing are discussed.
Althusser L (2006) Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation) The Anthropology of the State: A Reader 9(1), pp. 86-98.
Bardhi F and Eckhardt GM (2012) Access-based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research 39(4): 881-898.
Chatzidakis A (2015) Guilt and Ethical Choice in Consumption: A Psychoanalytic Perspective. Marketing Theory 15(1): 79-93.
Chomsky N (2007) Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Cluley R and Desmond J (2015) Why Psychoanalysis Now? Marketing Theory 15 (1): 3-8.
Crockett D and Davis L (2016) Commercial Mythmaking at the Holy Land Experience. Consumption Markets & Culture 19(2): pp. 206-227.
Fang T (2012) Yin Yang: A New Perspective on Culture. Management and Organization Review 8(1): 25-50.
Freud S (2013) The Interpretation of Dreams. Worcestershire: Read Books.
Giesler M (2008) Conflict and Compromise: Drama in Marketplace Evolution. Journal of Consumer Research 34(6): 739-753.
Giesler M and Veresiu E (2014) Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (3): 840-857.
Holt DB (2002) Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (1): 70-90.
Holt DB (2004) How Brands Become Icons: The Principles of Cultural Branding. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.
Holt D and Cameron D (2010) Cultural Strategy: Using Innovative Ideologies to Build Breakthrough Brands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jung CG and Von FM. (1968) Man and His Symbols. New York: Laurel.
Klein N (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Lamberton CP and Rose RL (2012) When is Ours Better than Mine? A Framework for Understanding and Altering Participation in Commercial Sharing Systems. Journal of Marketing 76(4): 109-125.
Lears TJ (2000) From Salvation to Self-realization: Advertising and the Therapeutic Roots of the Consumer Culture, 1880-1930. Advertising & Society Review 1(1).
Marx K and Engels F (1970) The German Ideology (Vol. 1). New York: International Publishers Co.
Mendelson S (2015) 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' Box Office: Record $40M Monday, $610M Worldwide’. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2015/12/22/star-wars-the-force-awakens-box-office-40-1m-monday-610m-worldwide/#186bc2e24838
Miles C (2015) Ericksonian therapy as a grounding for a theory of persuasive marketing dialogue. Marketing Theory 15(1): 95-111.
O’Shaughnessy J (2015) Note on the marginalizing of psychoanalysis in marketing. Marketing Theory 15(1): 17-19.
Oswald LR (2010) Marketing hedonics: Toward a psychoanalysis of advertising response. Journal of Marketing Communications 16(3): 107-131.
Peñaloza L (2000) The commodification of the American West: Marketers’ production of cultural meanings at the trade show. Journal of Marketing 64(4): 82-109.
Peñaloza L (2001) Consuming the American West: Animating cultural meaning and memory at a stock show and rodeo. Journal of consumer research 28(3): 369-398.
Reyes I, Nikhilesh D and Jennifer BK (2015) Disconnected/connected: On the “look” and the “gaze” of cell phones. Marketing Theory 15(1): 113-127.
Schwarzkopf S (2015) Mobilizing the depths of the market: Motivation research and the making of the disembedded consumer. Marketing Theory 15(1): 39-57.
Seregina A, and Schouten JW (2016) Resolving identity ambiguity through transcending fandom. Consumption Markets & Culture 20(2): 1-24.
Tadajewski M (2006) Remembering motivation research: toward an alternative genealogy of interpretive consumer research. Marketing Theory 6 (4): 429-466.
Thompson CJ (2004) Marketplace mythology and discourses of power. Journal of consumer research 31 (1): 162-180.
Thompson C and Kelly T (2008) Reconstructing the south: how commercial myths compete for identity value through the ideological shaping of popular memories and counter memories. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (5): 595-613.
Žižek S (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. Verso.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.