From Past To Present A Cognitive Work On “New Turkish Cinema”

Authors

  • Arif Can Güngör İstanbul Aydın University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2014.121

Keywords:

Turkish cinema, new cinema

Abstract

In recent years, “new” concept has become very consumable especially within the context of politics in our country. Generally, after certain periods in Turkey, “new”, representative of political changes and emphasizing reconstruction process, has been a concept that frequently used in paralel with political, social, economic and cultural use, from past to present. Turkish cinema has had many periods from its constructive years to present; some of which have been in diffuculties and crisises. Having been overcome after every crisis, Turkish Cinema has always recovered itself. After this recovery, process to be rising or expected to be shown up, has wanted to be emphasised by the characterisation of the “new” concept, needed to be created or created different structure.
New Cinema concept is considered as a genre as not possible to mention a real stream in the Turkish cinema. The search of the young directors for an alternative cinema language, experiencing types, using various production and filming styles have revealed a richness in development of our cinema. In this essay, New Cinema concept will be introduced in terms of its usage and meanings attributed to it in Turkish cinema. Moreover, its place and importance in Turkish cinema history will be discussed.

References

Akbulut, H.(2012). Yeni Türk Sinemasında Melodram. Nuri Bilge Ceylan and Zeki Demirkubuz Filmlerinde Melodram. İstanbul: Hayalperest.

Atam, Z.(2011). Yakın Plan Yeni Türk Sineması. İstanbul: Bağdat Street

Ayça, E.(1992). Türk Sineması ve Seyirci İlişkileri, Kurgu Magazine, Anadolu University, 11, 117-133.

Aygün, M. (2014) Yeni neyi Temsil Ediyor? Yeni Fetişizmi ve Yeni Türkiye Mitleri, Sosyologça, 8, 55-66.

Bauman, Z.(2000). Postmodernlik ve Hoşnutsuzlukları, (İ.Türkmen, Trans.) İstanbul: Ayrıntı.

Bookchin, M.(2013) Ekolojik Bir Topluma Doğru, (A.Yılmaz, Trans.) İstanbul: Sümer

Eisenstein, S. (1985). Film Biçimi ( N.Özön, Trans.). İstanbul: Payel.

Eşli, Özçınar, M.(2012). Türk Sinemasının Felsefi Arka Planı Sinemayı Felsefeyle Düşünmek, İstanbul: Doruk

Erdoğan, N.(2001). Üç Seyirci: Popüler Eğlence Biçimlerinin Alımlanması Üzerine Notlar. Türk Film Araştırmalarında Yeni Yönelimler II, 219-230. D. Derman(Ed.). İstanbul: Bağlam.

Erus, Z. Biryıldız E.(2007). Üçüncü Sinema ve Üçüncü Dünya Sineması, İstanbul: Es.

Evren, B.(1990). Türk Sinemasında Yeni Konumlar. İstanbul: Broy.

Genç Sinemacıların Bildirisi. Genç Sinema(1968).1, 1-18. İstanbul.

Göle, N.(2000). Melez Desenler. İstanbul: Metis.

Görücü, B.(1998). Yeni Sinema Dergisi Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Yeni Sinema, 4, 89-100.

Groys, B.(2013). Sanatın Gücü, (F. Candil, Trans.) İstanbul: Hayalperest.

Harrison C., Wood P.(2011). Sanat ve Kuram 1900-2000 Değişen Fikirler Antolojisi, İstanbul: Küre.

Kayalı, K.(1994). Yönetmenler Çerçevesinde Türk Sineması Üzerine Bir Yorum Denemesi, Ankara: Ayyıldız.

Kolker, R.(2011). Sinemanın Öykü Anlatıcıları, Film, Biçim ve Kültür. E.Yılmaz (Ed) 168-213. İstanbul: Deki.

Kongar, E.(1999). Toplumsal Değişme Kuramları ve Türkiye Gerçeği, İstanbul:Remzi.

Okumuş, F. (2014). Türk Sinemasında Tarihyazımı İçin Yöntem Arayışı, Ankara: Gece Library.

Oskay,Ü.(1991). Masal Semantiğinden Romanın Semantiğine Geçiş Sorunu, Varlık, 1001, 14-31.

Yeni Sinema.(2000). N.Özön (Ed) Sinema–TV Video Bilgisayarlı Sinema Sözlüğü, Kabalcı, p.813.

Öztürk, R. (27 Ekim 2001). Sinemamızın Yaratıcı Yönetmeni, Radikal Cumartesi.

Scognamillo, G.(1998). Türk Sinema Tarihi, İstanbul: Kabalcı.

Scognamillo, G.(1994). Amerikan Sineması, İstanbul: Ağaç

Smith Nowell Geofrey. (2005). Dünya Sinema Tarihi, İstanbul: Kabalcı.

Taşçıyan, A.(2001, 15 Temmuz) Yeni Dönem Türk Filmleri. Miliyet Pazar, s.8-9.

Yeni. (2011). Turkish Dictionary, 11th Edition, Ankara: Turkish Language Society

Vincenti, G.(1993). Sinemanın Yüz Yılı, (E. Ayça, Trans.), İstanbul: Evrensel

Yılmaz, E.(2009). 68 ve Sinema, İstanbul: Hayalet

Zeytinoğlu, E. (2012). Güncel Sanat ve Eski Paradoks, Toplum ve Bilim Magazine, 125, 205-210.

Zolberg, V.(2013). Bir Sanat Sosyolojisi Oluşturmak, (B.Özbay, Trans.) İstanbul: Boğaziçi University

Downloads

Published

2015-07-13

How to Cite

Güngör, A. C. (2015). From Past To Present A Cognitive Work On “New Turkish Cinema”. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 4(1), 122–153. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2014.121

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014): Fall 2014

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.